| Fan Art / Cartoons & Comics / Digital / Movies & TV | ©2012-2013 ~tclarke597 |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness |
The way you edited in Antman and Thor in this could use a second look, in my opinion. It almost looks like you set Antman's opacity very low, because the coloration looks like I'm playing "I Spy" with the buildings to find him; a little too blue and foggy. The light reflecting off of Thor's armor doesn't really fit well either, it's incredibly bright and stark against the poster (granted, some slack can be cut because I can only imagine how hard it was to find a good, dramatic picture of him with the "perfect" lighting for the project). Although, you could also have probably used the original picture of Thor in the movie poster you based this off of...
It's a very good concept, and Spidey on Hulk's shoulder made me giggle (and looks really well-done). I hope you don't mind me critiquing. No, I'm not a professional photo-editor; yes, I know it's hard to find that "perfect" combination of pictures; however, I did take 3 professional college classes that drummed photomanipulation into my skull, and at least have experience to share. I like to help a little too much, I think.. xD
I completely understand the Antman thing; and it doesn't help when the character hasn't really been made live-action yet, cosplayers aside (although, there was some brief discussion about a possible deleted scene from the movie that cameos Nathan Fillion as Hank... I can't find any evidence of this scene, so I'm not sure where my source found such information).
Antman does look better, though, and I saw Mjolnir was improved on the other photo as well. I have to say, though, it is impressive work. Good photo-manips can be challenging, and what I've seen in your gallery looks cool.
Thanks again for commenting, it's nice to hear others' thoughts about my work, both critical and complimentary. Especially when they're as well though out and structured as yours